POLITICS : Why didn't Japan invade the Soviet Union during WW2?

Sohail Khurianwala

works at Verscom Technologies & Services

23w ago

Many people who study about World War II are not aware of this:

I would like to quote from the above article.

From May to September 1939, the USSR and Japan fought an undeclared war involving over 100,000 troops.

This war played its part in altering world history.

In the summer of 1939, Soviet and Japanese armies clashed on the Manchurian-Mongolian frontier in a little-known conflict with far-reaching consequences.

This was no mere border clash, this undeclared war raged from May to September 1939 embroiling over 100,000 troops and 1,000 tanks and aircraft.

Some 30,000-50,000 men were killed and wounded. In the climactic battle, which lasted from August 20-31, 1939, the Japanese armies were encircled and crushed by Soviet Armor in the Far East.

This coincided precisely with the conclusion of the German-Soviet Nonaggression Pact (August 23, 1939) – Which gave Hitler the green light he wanted to invade Poland and the outbreak of World War II one week later when only Britain and France declared war on Nazi Germany.

These events are all connected.

This not so famous conflict also influenced key decisions in Tokyo and Moscow in 1941 that shaped the conduct and ultimately the outcome of World War II.

This conflict (called the Nomonhan Incident by Japanese, the Battle of Khalkhin Gol by Russians) was provoked by a notorious Japanese officer named Tsuji Masanobu, ring-leader of a clique in Japan’s Kwantung Army, which occupied Manchuria in the 1930s.

On the other side, Georgy Zhukov, who would later lead the Red Army to victory over Nazi Germany, commanded the Soviet forces.

In the first large clash in May 1939, a Japanese punitive attack failed and Soviet/Mongolian forces wiped out a 200-man Japanese unit. Infuriated, Kwantung Army escalated the fighting through June and July, launching a large bombing attack deep inside Mongolian territory and attacking across the border in division strength.

As successive Japanese assaults were repulsed by the Red Army, the Japanese continually upped the ante, believing they could force Moscow to back down. Stalin, however, outmaneuvered the Japanese and stunned them with a simultaneous military and diplomatic counter strike.

In August, as Stalin secretly angled for an alliance with Hitler, Zhukov amassed powerful forces near the front. When German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop flew to Moscow to sign the Nazi-Soviet Pact, Stalin unleashed Zhukov’s forces on the Japanese.

The future Red Army Marshal unveiled the tactics he would later employ with such devastating effect at Moscow, Stalingrad, Kursk, and elsewhere: a combined arms assault with massed infantry and artillery that fixed the enemy on the central front while powerful armored formations enveloped the enemy’s flanks, encircled, and ultimately crushed him in a battle of annihilation.

Over 75 percent of Japan’s ground forces at the front were killed in combat. At the same time, Stalin concluded the pact with Hitler, Japan’s nominal ally, leaving Tokyo diplomatically isolated and militarily humiliated.

The fact that the fighting at Nomonhan coincided with the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact was no coincidence.

While Stalin was openly negotiating with Britain and France for a purported anti-fascist alliance, and secretly negotiating with Hitler for their eventual alliance, which divided territory in Eastern Europe between the USSR and Nazi Germany, he was being attacked by German’s ally and anti-Comintern partner, Japan.

By the summer of 1939, it was clear that Europe was sliding toward war. Hitler was determined to move east, against Poland. Stalin’s nightmare, to be avoided at all costs, was a two-front war against Germany and Japan. His ideal outcome would be for the fascist/militarist capitalists (Germany, Italy, and Japan) to fight the bourgeois/democratic capitalists (Britain, France, and perhaps the United States), leaving the Soviet Union on the sidelines, the arbiter of Europe after the capitalists had exhausted themselves.

The Nazi-Soviet Pact was Stalin’s attempt to achieve his optimal outcome. Not only did it pit Germany against Britain and France and leave the Soviet Union out of the fight – it gave Stalin the freedom to deal decisively with an isolated Japan, which he did at Nomonhan. This is not merely a hypothesis. The linkage between Nomonhan and the Nazi-Soviet Pact is clear even in the German diplomatic documents published in Washington and London in 1948.

Recently revealed Soviet-era documents add confirming details.

Soviet General Zhukov won his golden spurs at Nomonhan/Khalkhin Gol – and thereby won Stalin’s confidence to entrust him with the high command, just in time to avert disaster in December 1941 when the spearheads of the Wehrmacht were just 20 miles from the spires of the Kremlin.

Zhukov was crucially able to halt the German onslaught and turn the tide at the gates of Moscow in early December 1941 (arguably the most decisive week of the Second World War) in part by deploying most of the forces from the Soviet Far East.

Many of these were the battle-tested troops he used to crush the Japanese at Nomonhan. The Soviet Far Eastern reserves – 15 infantry divisions, 3 cavalry divisions, 1,700 tanks, and 1.500 aircraft – were deployed westward in the autumn of 1941 after Stalin learned from his master spy - stationed in Tokyo - Richard Sorge (pronounced - Rishart Zorga) that Japan would not attack the Soviet Far East, because it had made an irrevocable decision for a southward expansion that would lead to war with the United States and Britain.

Stalin in September 1941, did not repeat the grave mistake he made in June 1941 where he angrily dismissed reports by the same spy that the German Armies would definitely invade the USSR on June 22nd with the remark :

“There is this squirt who has set himself up with some little factories and brothels in Japan and even he dares to send me ridiculous reports of an imminent German invasion.”

Japan had decided to gamble on using its powerful Navy to wallop the Americans and British since it did not forget the whacking its Army had received from the Soviets on the Soviet Manchurian border in 1939.

There were other considerations also.

It was the oil embargo imposed by the USA and Britain on the Empire of Japan after it overran French Indo-China, after the fall of France in 1940 to the Wehrmacht, which forced Japan to look desperately for oil and other resources vital for the survival of her empire in the East.

By September 1941, with the oil embargo by the USA and Britain in force, Japanese oil reserves had dropped to 50 million barrels, and their navy alone was burning 2,900 barrels of oil every hour.

The Japanese had reached a breaking point. If they did nothing, they would be out of oil and options in less than 2 years, If they chose war, there was a good chance they could lose a protracted conflict.

Given the possibility of success with the second option, versus none with the first option, the Japanese chose war.

Importantly, Siberian petroleum zones are in the West Siberian petroleum basin, Central Urals and the Sakhalin Island.

Eastern Siberia did not have the extensive oil wells like those which were already established in the Dutch East Indies at that time.

The Japanese leadership thought that securing the oil wells of the Dutch East Indies and invading South East Asia using their Army and powerful Navy was far easier than taking on the Soviet Armies again in Siberia in a winter campaign.

The only hindrances to securing the oil wells of the Dutch East Indies and transporting that oil back to Japan using the ocean route was the United States Pacific fleet and the Royal Navy in the Far East.

The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on Dec 7th 1941 was a knock out blow meant to disable the US fleet and make Japan the dominant Naval power in the Eastern Pacific so that resources from the Philippines, Dutch East Indies and British Malaya could come under the control of the Empire of Japan after their army had taken over these countries and tin, oil, rubber and other raw materials needed for the Japanese industries could easily be transported to Japan using the sea route.

The Japanese air force immediately struck mortal blows at the Royal Navy also in the Far East by sinking two of Britain’s largest battleships: The Prince of Wales and Repulse off Kuantan in the South China Sea on December 10th 1941, before they embarked on their lightning conquest of British Malaya and the Dutch East Indies.

The Prince of Wales and Repulse were the first capital ships to be sunk solely by naval - air power on the open sea.

They also overran the Philippines which was a US colony at that time.

(The US had acquired the Philippines after their victory in the Spanish American war.

References:

More

Evgeny Bakhtin

Russian who watches Russia from outside for years.

81w ago

Most of answers are based on assumption that if Japan would attack USSR, it should go until Moscow, or at least take the whole Siberia. Which doesn’t make sense, indeed.

However, these two areas did make sense for Japan:

These two areas make sense for Japan not in terms of resource base, but rather strategic defense of it’s rear and strategic offence towards China.

It makes even more sense, if you consider that USSR was already in proxy war with Japan since 1937 - Soviet Volunteer Group helping China to fight Japan at the air. Also, you have constant small conflicts starting from 1935 - Soviet–Japanese border conflicts.

So, it makes a lot of sense to Japan to attack USSR!

But in contrary, Japan seals Soviet–Japanese Neutrality Pact in April 1941. And focuses southward.

However, USSR didn’t trust Japan with this Pact and kept about 1.000.000 soldiers, tanks, aviation, etc. at Far East. Which were damn needed at German front!

So, basically the answer is - Japan had comparatively less need to go North than to go South, and USSR was well armed there.

More

Ozgur Zeren

Author at ViaPopuli.com

96w ago

They tried - in Khalkin Gol battle, they attacked USSR.

That was very probably a test of Red Army's strength on behalf of the alliance Japanese belonged to - Anti-Comintern. Since there were 2-3 countries on the planet who claimed to be communists, and the only sizable country was USSR, Anti-Comintern alliance was basically an anti USSR alliance.

How do we conclude that this was a test, is rather simple:

A big Japanese army starts with border skirmishes, then escalates into a full blown battle. For ~4 months, it conducts full blown operations with no impediment to its supplies, requisitions or manpower.

Then when it is beaten back, Japanese government says this was done by a 'rogue general' who 'acted on his own'.

So a rogue general acting on his own fought a massive battle for 4 months, Japanese government not only was not able to control him, but magically his supplies, manpower and equipment flow from Japan did not get impeded in any way.

Of course not. No general in Japanese army could even imagine going against orders.

So it was a test to check Red Army's fighting power.

If the test evaluated well, Japan would not hesitate from invading Siberia, which would very easily be accompanied by Nazi Germany invading from the west. Poland would be more than cooperative with that kind of affair. Which was what the West was hoping.

Instead Japanese got steamrolled. Khalkin Gol was a beyond decisive victory for Red Army, in which Zhukov implemented the very tactics which were to be used in the Eastern Front to Germany.

Molotov-Ribbentrop pact in between USSR and Germany was signed just 4 days after Zhukov started his final offensive in Khalkin Gol, and it was evident that Japanese army was being run over. This is a critical point. Practically pact's existence is due to the result of Khalkin Gol.

So now it was seen that Red Army was strong, Japanese had nowhere near the power necessary to even beat the forces Zhukov already had in Eastern USSR, they had no hopes of moving forward, leave aside reaching any Oil fields in USSR, and they had limited oil reserves.

Which meant that trying to invade Siberia would be a craziness which wouldn't even 'start' happening.

Wisely, they turned into the only thing they could do - gamble against US with Pearl Harbor and hope for a quick peace on favorable terms.

More

Omanshu Thapliyal

works at Purdue University

125w ago

TL;DR 
It was not merely due to resource scarcity, but resource scarcity combined with a change in state policy from Hokushin-ron to Nanshin-ronJapan had already occupied parts of French Indochina (1940) before signing the neutrality pact (1941) with the Soviet Union (therefore, the neutrality pact was not the only reason)

Many of the answers have tackled the scarcity of resources in the Japanese mainland to be the reason for their southward expansion, but it misses a key point of the change in the Japanese state's policies in the pre war period.
Simply put, Japan didn't invade the Soviet Union because of a stark change in the Imperial state's policies.

In the pre-WW2 period, Japan maintained hostile borders with USSR and the general of the Imperial Japanese army, Kenkichi Ueda, was a staunch supporter of Hokushin-ron 北進論. The Imperial army at that time believed in the Hokushin-ron, or the Strike North doctrine. Under this Northern expansion doctrine, Japan considered it destined for her to conquer the sparsely populated, mineral rich regions of northern Asia. This policy saw steep budget cuts incurred by the Imperial Navy and large scale production of tanks, etc. However, under Ueda's generalship during the Soviet-Japanese conflicts in the 30's, repeated Japanese losses resulted in a Neutrality Pact in 1941. This was followed by a a drastically different policy, Nanshin-ron 南進論. This was the governing doctrine of the Japanese Imperial motives during the immediate pre-WW2 period and it claimed the Southeast Asian region to be Japanese sphere of influence and that the "Pacific was destined to be a Japanese lake".

After this stark change of Imperial policy, Japan carried out huge Naval militarization violating the Washington Naval Treaty and with the promulgation of the Toa shin Shitsujo (New Order in East Asia), Nanshin-ron became the adopted as the national policy in 1936. It should be noted that Japan had already occupied Northern French Indochina by September 1940 and the Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact came later in 1941.

The Imperial motive of Japan were affected by the fact that it being an island nation; this meant a limited supply of resources and raw materials. This could be mitigated by the new state policy to occupy the Pacific region and southeast Asia.

This change of policy is prominently reflected in how the Japanese occupations and militaristic tendencies behaved with time:



POLITICS: Donald Trump tells Arab leaders he'll move US embassy to Jerusalem

Senior US officials have said Trump is likely on Wednesday (Thursday AEDT) to recognise Jerusalem as Israel's capital while delaying relocating the embassy from Tel Aviv for another six months. Evan Vucci

President Donald Trump told Arab leaders he intends to move the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, a decision that breaks with decades of US policy and risks fuelling further unrest in the Middle East.

Senior US officials have said Trump is likely on Wednesday (Thursday AEDT) to recognise Jerusalem as Israel's capital while delaying relocating the embassy from Tel Aviv for another six months, though he is expected to order his aides to begin planning such a move immediately.

US endorsement of Israel's claim to all of Jerusalem as its capital would reverse long-standing US policy that the city's status must be decided in negotiations with the Palestinians, who want East Jerusalem as the capital of their future state. The international community does not recognise Israeli sovereignty over the entire city, home to sites holy to the Muslim, Jewish and Christian religions.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Jordan's King Abdullah, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and Saudi Arabia's King Salman, who all received phone calls from Trump, joined a mounting chorus of voices warning that unilateral US steps on Jerusalem would derail a fledgling US-led peace effort and unleash turmoil in the region.

Palestinians pray, earlier this year, outside the Lion's Gate near the Al Aqsa Mosque compound in Jerusalem's Old City. Ariel Schalit

At the same time, a senior Israeli minister appeared to welcome Trump's decision on Jerusalem while vowing that Israel was preparing for any outbreak of violence.

Trump notified Abbas "of his intention to move the American Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem," Abbas spokesman Nabil Abu Rdainah said.

Dangerous consequences

Abbas, in response, "warned of the dangerous consequences such a decision would have to the peace process and to the peace, security and stability of the region and of the world" and also appealed to the Pope and the leaders of Russia, France and Jordan to intervene.

The Jordanian monarch, whose dynasty is the custodian of the Muslim holy sites in Jerusalem, told Trump that moving the embassy there would have "dangerous repercussions" for the region and would obstruct US efforts to promote Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, according to a palace statement.

Jerusalem's old city. Oded Balilty

Jordan plans to convene an emergency meeting of the Arab League and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation on Trump's new Jerusalem policy, said Foreign Minister Ayman al Safadi.

Egypt's Sisi cautioned Trump against "taking measures that would undermine the chances of peace" and complicate matters in the Middle East, a presidential statement released in Cairo said.

King Salman stressed to Trump that any US announcement on the status of Jerusalem "will hurt peace talks and increase tension in the region  and said it would "inflame Muslim feelings all over the world,  the Saudi Press Agency said.

None of the leaders' statements said whether Trump, who was also due to talk to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, specified the timing of an embassy move, a notion that successive Israeli governments have supported.

But US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Trump was expected to sign a national security waiver - as have his predecessors - keeping the embassy in Tel Aviv for another six months but would commit to expediting a move. It was unclear, however, whether he would set a date.

Trump, who promised during the 2016 presidential campaign to move the embassy to Jerusalem and is expected to announce his decision in a speech on Wednesday, appears intent on satisfying the pro-Israel, right-wing base that helped him win the presidency.

Israel captured Arab East Jerusalem in the 1967 Middle East war and later annexed it, a move not recognised internationally.

'A big mistake'

Israeli Intelligence Minister Israel Katz, who met last week with US officials in Washington, told Israel's Army Radio: "My impression is that the president will recognise Jerusalem, the eternal capital of the Jewish people for 3,000 years, as the capital of the state of Israel.

Asked if Israel was preparing for a wave of violence if Trump recognises Jerusalem as the Israeli capital, he said: "We are preparing for every option. Anything like that can always erupt. If Abu Mazen (Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas) will lead it in that direction then he will be making a big mistake.

Turkey threatened on Tuesday to cut diplomatic ties with Israel if Trump recognises Jerusalem. "Mr. Trump, Jerusalem is the red line of Muslims," Turkey's President Tayyip Erdogan told a parliamentary meeting of his ruling AK Party.

Senior US officials told Reuters some officers in the State Department were also deeply concerned and the European Union, the Palestinian Authority, Saudi Arabia and the Arab League all warned that any such declaration would have repercussions across the region.

Netanyahu has so far declined to speculate on what Trump might say.

But Katz took to Twitter to reject Turkey's threat and reiterate Israel's position on the city, which is one of a long list of stumbling blocks in years of failed peace talks with the Palestinians.

'We don't take orders'

"We don't take orders or accept threats from the president of Turkey," he wrote.

A US official said the consensus US intelligence estimate on US recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital was that it would risk triggering a backlash against Israel, and also potentially against US interests in the Middle East.

It is also likely to upset an Israeli-Palestinian peace push led by Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, in pursuit of what the US president has called the "ultimate deal." The initiative has made little progress.

The European Union's top diplomat, Federica Mogherini, said on Tuesday that "any action that would undermine" peace efforts to create two separate states for the Israelis and the Palestinians "must absolutely be avoided."

Speaking alongside US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson in Brussels, she said Jerusalem's status would have to be agreed through negotiations.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has  consistently warned against any unilateral action that would have the potential to undermine the two-state solution,  UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric told reporters in New York.

"We have always regarded Jerusalem as a final status issue that must be resolved through direct negotiations between the two parties based on relevant Security Council resolutions," Dujarric said.

The Arab League and Saudi Arabia repeated past warnings, following statements by France and Jordan in recent days.

Past Israeli-Palestinian rifts have deteriorated into protests, attacks and fighting and further destabilised the region. 

During World War II, if Germany had invaded the Soviet Union two months earlier, would Germany have won the war?


Khalid Elhassan

Eclectic Rabbit Hole, and all around history buff

94w ago

No.  If the Germans had attacked two months earlier, which would have been around April 21st, it would have backfired on them disastrously as only a few weeks into the campaign they would have been forced to bring activities to a standstill.  That is because of the spring Rasputitsa , the Eastern European mud season when unpaved roads, which is to say the overwhelming majority of roads on the Eastern Front, become nearly impassable.

These guys are stuck until the roads dry

The Rasputitsa, caused by snow melt in spring and autumn rain in fall, would have ground an early Operation Barbarossa to a halt or agonizingly slow crawl as attacking units, and more importantly their supply chain, would have struggled to move in a sea of mud.  That not only would have limited the depth of initial German advances, but would also have given the Soviets a desperately needed breather and opportunity to regroup and fortify while waiting for the roads to dry and the war to resume.

This is not Blitzkrieg weather

The need to account for the Rasputitsa is why the German invasion was launched when it was, contrary to the numerous myths that developed later to explain the supposed "delay" in the launching of Barparossa.

No brilliant lightening maneuvers in these conditions

As it was, throughout the course of the war on the Eastern Front, a campaign rhythm developed in which the pace of activities slowed down significantly for a few weeks twice a year, in spring and autumn during the semiannual Rasputitsa, while both sides waited for the roads to dry enough for the resumption of intensive fighting.

More

Oren Roded

studied Law

43w ago

The perception of Operation Barbarossa seems to be widely flawed among most people. People believe that the Russian winter and rasputitsa (muddy season) completely derailed the German juggernaut but this was not really the case, while it is true that after the muddy season only 1 in 10 German tanks was functional and the rest were cannibalised for parts, it was the strategy that the Germans opted for that really killed them in the end. Army group south was ordered to take Kiev and was later re-designated army group Ukraine in 1942 and while they took 450,000 Russian POW’s, the russians managed to build back this army in a matter of months. The germans throughout the war at this point opted for quick lightning blitzkrieg attacks into enemy territory so I don't understand why the opted for a siege in Leningrad, a 900 day siege to be exact, even though the Germans brought with them their knowledge of trenches from the first world war and were thus able to live through the Russian winters in relative peace they still failed to capture leningrad and bring the 1 million russian defenders to surrender, they lost thousands of men in order to try to take Leningrad which apart from its port had little to offer other than a symbolic victory. Army group center took the biggest beating especially at Stalingrad where they were led into a trap. Stalin had heard from his spy in Tokyo that the Japanese were not going to attack Russian again like they did in 1938 at Khalkin Ghol, but were instead going to attack south at pearl harbor, this allowed stalin to take his experienced siberian armies and bring them down to stalingrad, Zhukov then initiated operation Uranus in which he attacked the flanks of the German 6th army that was protected by poorly equipped lithuanian and romanina troops, they were no match for the crack russian troops and soon enough the german 6th army found itself locked in a pocket of death.

So to be honest it really would not have mattered if the Germans had attacked 2 months earlier because it would not have changed their tactics and strategies.

More

Samuel Smith

Interested in history, avid reader

110w ago

No. 
They might have made a little more progress. But they would have still been facing these same problems. 
Overstretched supply lines Supplying 4 million men isn't easy, especially when they are deep in enemy territory and split up into four different armies. This problem is compounded by the fact that the Russians are using the "scorched earth tactic" and going to great efforts to deny the enemy supplies of any kind. Also if the attack had been started earlier the supply problem would have been even more pronounced, since there would most likely have been to little and too few vehicles to transport them without the build up.The Battle of Stalingrad. Even if the attack had started earlier the army would have still bogged down at Stalingrad, and even had they been victorious massive losses would still have been incurred.
Hitler This turned out to be a crippling disadvantage to German strategy. He was a madman who tried to dictate his general actions, and subsequently caused some of the most catastrophic failures of the war. Most historians agree that his idea to invade and conqueror Russia was his worst mistake, and his resolution not to withdraw made it  continually worse.
Winter No matter what they did the Germans were bound to encounter winter. If you would look at this map you can see how far the invasion got.

By the time winter came only a fraction of all Russia was in German hands. So it leads one to believe that in if the invasion had been launched earlier it would still have been slowed by Russian resistance and finally halted by winter.

This is my opinion and there may be others better informed who differ with it, but since history has already happened all we are left with is conjectures and no proof of how things "would have gone."

More

Bernie Schiemer

34w ago

The essential doctrine of Blitzkrieg requires concentration of your forces.

In February 1941 the Germans moved 1.5 x panzer divisions to Africa (90th Light and 15th Panzer).

In May they invaded Yugoslavia, Greece and Crete. This delayed their Russian offensive by six weeks (Barbarossa was due to begin in early May), so they were in fact aiming for an earlier start. In the Yugo/Greek campaign, the Germans lost well over 300 transport planes (270 alone in Crete) and many thousands of troops lost and/or tied up defending nothing.

In August 1941 the Germans send another panzer division to Africa (21st Panzer). Plus Rommel’s advances in Africa required 6000+ trucks to provide water and petrol to his forces.

Imagine the Germans with 3 x more panzer divisions, 300+ transport planes (supplies and more supplies), 6,000 + additional trucks and additional 6 weeks of campaigning, plus with Rommel driving a corp along with him, they almost certainly would have taken Moscow, and may well have beaten the Russians.

They had to beat the Russians in the first year or it was all over. Their economy was not set up for a long campaign, and their replacement pool of troops, equipment and spare parts was dangerously low. At least an early May start with ALL of their available forces and supplies would have given them the best chance possible.

If they had beaten the Russians in 1941, could you imagine how deluded Hilter and his cronies would have become. The US and Britain would have still prevailed but it probably would have been a nuclear rather than a conventional finish.

More


FOREIGN NEWS: Trump forges ahead on Jerusalem-as-capital despite warnings

President Donald Trump will recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital on Wednesday despite intense Arab, Muslim and European opposition to a move that would upend decades of U.S. policy and risk potentially violent protests.

Trump will instruct the State Department to begin the multi-year process of moving the American embassy from Tel Aviv to the holy city, U.S. officials said Tuesday. It remains unclear, however, when he might take that physical step, which is required by U.S. law but has been waived on national security grounds for more than two decades.

The officials said numerous logistical and security details, as well as site determination and construction, will need to be finalized first. Because of those issues, the embassy is not likely to move for at least 3 or 4 years, presuming there is no future change in U.S. policy.

To that end, the officials said Trump will sign a waiver delaying the embassy move, which is required by U.S. law every six months. He will continue to sign the waiver until preparations for the embassy move are complete.

The officials said recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital will be an acknowledgement of "historical and current reality" rather than a political statement and said the city's physical and political borders will not be compromised. They noted that almost all of Israel's government agencies and parliament are in Jerusalem, rather than Tel Aviv, where the U.S. and other countries maintain embassies.

The U.S. officials spoke to reporters on condition of anonymity Tuesday because they were not authorized to publicly preview Trump's Wednesday announcement. Their comments mirrored those of officials who spoke on the issue last week.

The declaration of Jerusalem as Israel's capital is a rhetorical volley that could have its own dangerous consequences. The United States has never endorsed the Jewish state's claim of sovereignty over any part of Jerusalem and has insisted its status be resolved through Israeli-Palestinian negotiation.

The mere consideration of Trump changing the status quo sparked a renewed U.S. security warning on Tuesday. America's consulate in Jerusalem ordered U.S. personnel and their families to avoid visiting Jerusalem's Old City or the West Bank, and urged American citizens in general to avoid places with increased police or military presence.

Trump, as a presidential candidate, repeatedly promised to move the U.S. embassy. However, U.S. leaders have routinely and unceremoniously delayed such a move since President Bill Clinton signed a law in 1995 stipulating that the United States must relocate its diplomatic presence to Jerusalem unless the commander in chief issues a waiver on national security grounds.

Key national security advisers — including Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Defense Secretary Jim Mattis — have urged caution, according to the officials, who said Trump has been receptive to some of their concerns.

The concerns are real: Trump's recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital could be viewed as America discarding its longstanding neutrality and siding with Israel at a time that the president's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, has been trying to midwife a new peace process into existence. Trump, too, has spoken of his desire for a "deal of the century" that would end Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

U.S. officials, along with an outside adviser to the administration, said they expected a broad statement from Trump about Jerusalem's status as the "capital of Israel." The president isn't planning to use the phrase "undivided capital," according to the officials. Such terminology is favored by Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and would imply Israel's sovereignty over east Jerusalem, which the Palestinians seek for their own future capital.

Jerusalem includes the holiest ground in Judaism. But it's also home to Islam's third-holiest shrine and major Christian sites, and forms the combustible center of the Israeli-Arab conflict. Any perceived harm to Muslim claims to the city has triggered volatile protests in the past, both in the Holy Land and across the Muslim world.

Within the Trump administration, officials on Tuesday fielded a flood of warnings from allied governments.

The Jerusalem declaration notwithstanding, one official said Trump would insist that issues of sovereignty and borders must be negotiated by Israel and the Palestinians. The official said Trump would call for Jordan to maintain its role as the legal guardian of Jerusalem's Muslim holy places, and reflect Israel and Palestinian wishes for a two-state peace solution.

Still, any U.S. declaration on Jerusalem's status ahead of a peace deal "would harm peace negotiation process and escalate tension in the region," Saudi Arabia's King Salman told Trump Tuesday, according to a Saudi readout of their telephone conversation. Declaring Jerusalem as Israel's capital, the king said, "would constitute a flagrant provocation to all Muslims, all over the world."

In his calls to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Jordan's King Abdullah II, Trump delivered what appeared to be identical messages of intent. Both leaders warned Trump that moving the embassy would threaten Mideast peace efforts and security and stability in the Middle East and the world, according to statements from their offices. The statements didn't speak to Trump's plans for recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital.

Ahmed Aboul-Gheit, the head of the Arab League, urged the U.S. to reconsider any recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital, warning of "repercussions." Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan told his Parliament such recognition was a "red line" and that Turkey could respond by cutting diplomatic ties with Israel.

French President Emmanuel Macron said he reminded Trump in a phone call Monday that Jerusalem should be determined through negotiations on setting up an independent Palestine alongside Israel. Meeting U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson in Brussels, EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini said actions undermining peace efforts "must be absolutely avoided."

Despite Trump's comments to world leaders, U.S. officials said an embassy announcement wasn't seen as imminent. Instead, they said Trump on Wednesday would likely sign a waiver pushing off any announcement of moving the embassy to Jerusalem for another six months.

Trump also will give wide latitude to his ambassador in Israel, David Friedman, to make a determination on when a Jerusalem embassy would be appropriate, according to the officials. Friedman has spoken in favor of the move.

Majdi Khaldi, Abbas' diplomatic adviser, said Trump's recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital could end Washington's role as mediator.

"This would mean they decided, on their own, to distance themselves from efforts to make peace," Khaldi told The Associated Press in perhaps the most sharply worded reaction by a Palestinian official. He said such recognition would lead the Palestinians to eliminate contacts with the United States.

Changing Jerusalem's status would be "a stab in the back," Husam Zomlot, the Palestinians' chief delegate to Washington, told the AP.

Palestinian political factions led by Abbas' Fatah movement called for daily protest marches this week, starting Wednesday. East Jerusalem, now home to more than 300,000 Palestinians, was captured by Israel in 1967 and then annexed in a move most of the international community has not recognized.

___

Federman reported from Jerusalem. Associated Press writers Karin Laub in Amman, Jordan; Josh Lederman in Brussels; Matthew Pennington and Bradley Klapper in Washington; Elaine Ganley in Paris; Suzan Fraser in Ankara, Turkey, and Aya Batrawy in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, contributed to this report.

POLITICS: Osinbajo visits Adamawa State over death of 95 persons

Vice president of Nigeria, Professor Yemi Osinbajo visited Dong village in Anambra State, one of the villages attacked and burnt on Monday by militant herdsmen where  over 45 corpses.

The Hama Batta, Alhamdu Teneke, told Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo, who was on a visit to the troubled communities on Tuesday that over 45 corpses had been given a mass burial in the community.

Also, youths in Numan alleged that fighter jets of the Nigerian Air Force killed over 50 residents through air bombardment of the community.

It is believed that over 100 might have been killed in the invasion of about five villages in the Numan area of the state by herdsmen.

The District Head of Dong and the village head of Lawuru, another village in the area, were also killed in the attacks.

Osinbajo said his visit to the state was to find a lasting solution to the unending killings following the clashes between the locals and Fulani herdsmen in Numan and its environs.

The VP, who held a closed-door meeting with the Lamido of Adamawa, Alhaji Barkindo Mustapha, at the Presidential Lodge of the Yola International Airport, condemned leaders fuelling violent conflicts in the country.

At Numan, Osinbajo met with the Hama Bachama, Col. Honest Stephen (retd.), saying “leaders, who fail to ensure peace in the land have lost the right to leadership.”

The Vice-President’s visit was nearly marred by youths who were protesting the alleged killing of over 50 residents by NAF fighter jets.

The youths, who had gathered for the mass burial of the 50 corpses reportedly killed by the fighter jets, seized the visit of the VP to converge on the palace of the paramount ruler to protest the killing of the residents by the jets.

Osinbajo said the government was particularly concerned about the casualties involving women and children.

“Every one of us, who is a leader, will know that something has gone wrong. Anybody can fight, anybody can kill, only true leaders can bring people together and make progress,” he stated.

While in Dong, one of the villages completely razed by the invaders, residents said the gunmen attacked the village in their hundreds.

Osinbajo added, “The reason why we are here is to see for ourselves. Your Excellency, what we have seen here, as you have said, is not the first time, is very sad, that lives have been lost and properties destroyed.

“The first thing of course is to find how we can compensate the loss and take immediate steps and make sure that NEMA immediately supplies relief materials and also restores some things destroyed to the state where they were before the destruction and that is the reason the President has sent me here.’’

“We must ensure perpetrators of violence are prevented with every power at our disposal. This is the time to come together to make progress as a people. There is no reason why we should allow so much poverty and all we are doing is fighting and killing each other. No reason.

“Our role is to provide security and resources so that everybody can enjoy their lives as citizens of this country.”

Source: ( Punch Newspaper )


POLITICS: 2019: Senate President, Saraki speaks on dumping APC for PDP

Senate President, Bukola Saraki, has said that he will not dump the All Progressives Congress, APC.

The Senate President spoke with Punch through his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Yusuph Olaniyonu, on Tuesday.

He pointed out that as a founding father of the APC, he would remain in the party.

He said, “There is nothing like that and there is nothing to suggest that. Every member must come from somewhere. Are you going to ask the President [Muhammadu Buhari] whether he would go back to the Congress for Progressive Change?

“You’re not going to ask Asiwaju [Bola Tinubu] whether he will return to the Action Congress of Nigeria.

“Everybody has where they are coming from. As far as my principal is concerned, he is a founding father of this party. There is nothing like that.”

The former Governor of Kwara State was among 10 other members of the Senate, who on January 29, 2014, announced their defection from the PDP to the APC.

The 11 lawmakers had written to the then Senate President, Senator David Mark, to officially declare their defection.

A former Vice President, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar had over a week ago announced his resignation from the ruling All Progressives Congress, APC, and last weekend he officially returned to the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP.

His move prompted speculations that other APC bigwigs may also dump the party ahead of the 2019 general elections.

Related Topics:APCPDPSaraki

Report a problem

52dislike

TECHNOLOGY: Here Are Some Reasons Why Your Smartphone Gets Hot And Drain Battery

Leaving your phone directly to the sun, is not the only way your phone can get hot. Moreover, we are no longer in the summer and this doesn’t mean your phone cannot get hot when using it. There are many reasons and problems causing the phone to drain battery.
The main truth is that, there’s no true fact on why phone gets hot because many things causes it but it’s well known that metal devices usually get hot than glass devices by heat conductivity.

We all use removable or non-removable battery and it can cause big problem to the smartphone, if it gets worse. It’s not safe to hold hot smartphone on your hand and at the same, still stay confortable pressing it.

It is normal for your phone to get hot a little when it does multiple tasks
If your phone gets hot above normal degree, there’s no cause for alarm. If it persists while running game or heavy applications, it’s still normal. After closing the apps for some time, and it still gets hot, then you can worry.

There are many reasons why your phone gets hot and they are: multi-tasking, having a too tight case (pouch), installing an unofficial ROM or using a charger in poor condition. It is not safe to charge your phone with a bad charger.

1. Unofficial ROM – For the installation of an unofficial ROM, it could possibly affect some part of the code which will make the processor not work well. It is recommended you install the official ROM or any other one you trust that won’t result in a problem.

2. Using a too tight pouch or case can cause your smartphone to get hot – Even though our phone doesn’t have cooling systems or fan, it does have an air vent, charging port and loudspeaker. Our phone will get hotter if all these are covered with case or pouch.

3. Leave your phone in dry places and don’t use it while charging – It may sound funny, but we have to be careful of where we put our phone. If you are used to placing your phone on top of the computer, on the television, under the bed lamp or on appliances like refrigerator or microwave definitely the temperature of your phone will increase and much more if it is in charge.

Generally, it is not advisable to use your phone while charging, since it will delay the charging and also increase the temperature which will put your phone at high risk.

Hope this article is helpful? Kindly take your time to share and drop your comments.

BUSINESS : Dangote crashes cement online sales price, signs on Jumia


In a new move designed to reduce price and ease logistics inherent in the purchase of its products, the management of Dangote Cement Plc has signed a pact with foremost e-commerce platform, Jumia Nigeria, to offer for sale its cement to customers online.

At the unveiling of the deal in Lagos, Dangote Cement’s Key Account Director, Chux Mogbolu, said Dangote Cement was happy to partner with the online shopping giant to make Dangote cement available with ease to customers.

A statement yesterday from the Corporate Communications department of the Dangote Group explained that Nigerians and corporate bodies wishing to purchase a minimum of 300 bags of 50kg of Dangote cement and above could now order on Jumia from the comfort of their rooms at a reasonable price of N2,500 per bag as opposed to open market price.

The statement added that the order would be delivered to any place of the consumer’s choice, provided such customers live in Lagos, Abuja and Port Harcourt for now, without any extra cost for transportation.

He said, “Dangote Cement decided to work with Jumia Nigeria based on its credibility and excellent performance over the years in online shopping management. The new initiative will help arrest the scams perpetrated by online fraudsters who deceive the people by asking them to purchase Dangote Cement for N1000 per bag.”

The Chief Executive Officer of Jumia Nigeria, Juliet Anammah, said the deal with Dangote Cement was part of efforts to deepen service delivery on the Jumia Nigeria online platform.


LIFESTYLE: Bride breaks down in tears after husband-to-be’s ex-girlfriend stood up in church, and claimed they were still dating


According to trending reports on Twitter, a bride who was about to get married to her beloved groom, left the church venue in tears after her husband-to-be’s ex girlfriend stood up in church, and claimed she’s still in a relationship with the husband.

The ex-girlfriend, claimed they are still dating, and the bride just broke down… This happened in malawi.

Twitter user, @JMalikay_27 shared on Twitter, “Another wedding canceled yesterday after the guys ex-stood up in church and said the guy was still her boyfriend. Meanwhile the bride??.”

See photos of the heartbroken bride below;


ENTERTAINMENT: See What Iyabo Ojo Wore To Psauma’s 50th Birthday Celebration


Nollywood actress/producer Iyabo Ojo is letting everyone know she is one hot mama!

The mom, who will be turning 40 in a couple of days, had jaws dropping when she stepped out for the 50th birthday celebration of Fuji star Pasuma.

Iyabo, had on a deep blue dress which hugged her every curve highlighting her hourglass figure as she posed up a storm for the gram.

She had her hair pulled back in a bun and finished off the look with minimal silver jewelry.

More photos below;


 


I Worked For Bobrisky For 6 Months Without Getting Paid, He Collected The Money MC Galaxy Gave Me” — Jacob


Bobrisky’s former gate man, Jacob after many believed he betrayed Bobrisky, has finally spoken after his boss, fired him from work.

In a video obtained by Krakshq, Jacob revealed he has been working for Bobrisky for the past 6 months, and has never paid him a dime for his work.

According to this new development, it seems Bobrisky has just been using Jacob, and most of his snaps about paying Jacob might just be untrue.

Jacob says he does not have anyone in Lagos, and has pleaded for help.

Jacob also revealed that folks sent him money to him through Bobrisky, but then the cross dresser will pocket the money, and refuse to give him.

Jacob also said after he featured in MC Galaxy’s song, MC gave him the sum of N40,000.. But then his Boss, Bobrisky, collected everything from him.

Watch the video below;

Recall, Jacob had earlier told Bobrisky that his father was very ill, and doctors say they’d have to amputate his leg..Because of Jacob’s loyalty, Bobrisky gave Jacob the sum of N60,000.. Bobo didn’t just stop there, he shared the story on his Snapchat, and some his his followers promised to help Jacob with money.

It now came as a shock to us after Bobrisky revealed Jacob lied about his father’s health, as he’s still in Lagos chilling with some of his friends.

Below is Bobrisky’s rant:

Now he’s unveiled a new Gateman, someone he says Jacob brought to him to fill his place, pending the time he’d come back to Lagos.

His name is Titus, and he says he’s not a betrayer like Jacob.

Categories: Entertainment News
Tags: BobriskyJacob

Related

Bobrisky reacts to the betrayal by his former gateman, says he’s been crying ever since

Bobrisky has displayed his sadness and sorrow over what he calls an open betrayal by his former employee Jacuurb whom…

Rift between singer Kiss Daniel and his estranged record label, G-Worldwide Entertainment gets messier

In a twist of events, it is now clear that the rift between singer, Anidugbe Daniel, aka Kiss Daniel, and…

‘Why not call her’ – Fans blast Funke Adesiyan over Instagram post to Funke Akindele

Nollywood actress, Funke Adesiyan, has been dragged by her followers on Instagram over a message she made to her colleague…

Funke Akindele shares cryptic message about her ignoring haters

Nollywood actress, Funke Akindele a.k.a Jenifa, took to Instagram to share a new video which came with a cryptic message…

Lady tells Davido he will never be nominated for an International award, He Reacts

This year has to be the Best for Davido, as he’s won so many awards, and released several bangers this…

Ebuka Obi-Uchendu recounts how he was chased and shot by SARS officials

As many more people continue to join the movement of the #EndSARS campaign, Nigerian entertainment sensations, Ebuka also has something…

Previous PostLady Tells Davido He Will Never Be Nominated For An International Award, He Reacts

Next PostDavido Supports Kiss Daniel As His Lawyers Responds To G-Worldwide

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

 Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

 Notify me of new posts by email.

Back to top